<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lecture 1 &#124; Programming Paradigms (Stanford)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 03:14:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Octalnet</title>
		<link>http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford/comment-page-1#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>Octalnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Excellent, except ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Excellent, except one thing. He says that C and variants compile to assembly code. It might have been a slip-up, but it compiles to machine code which can then be represented using assembly mnemonics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Excellent, except &#8230;</b> <br /> Excellent, except one thing. He says that C and variants compile to assembly code. It might have been a slip-up, but it compiles to machine code which can then be represented using assembly mnemonics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Octalnet</title>
		<link>http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford/comment-page-1#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator>Octalnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford#comment-1366</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;No, that&#039;s not ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; No, that&#039;s not accurate either. A compiler converts C/++ to optimized machine code. It would be completely dumb to convert to an assembly source, then assemble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>No, that&#8217;s not &#8230;</b> <br /> No, that&#8217;s not accurate either. A compiler converts C/++ to optimized machine code. It would be completely dumb to convert to an assembly source, then assemble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hyhu84</title>
		<link>http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford/comment-page-1#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator>hyhu84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;any data structure ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; any data structure or algorithm course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>any data structure &#8230;</b> <br /> any data structure or algorithm course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: decoran234</title>
		<link>http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford/comment-page-1#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>decoran234</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Are you sure? This ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Are you sure? This guy is a professor, just saying</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Are you sure? This &#8230;</b> <br /> Are you sure? This guy is a professor, just saying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MajDigi</title>
		<link>http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford/comment-page-1#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>MajDigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;That&#039;s not accurate ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; That&#039;s not accurate.  Most compilers will convert the C/++ to ASM, and then send it to the assembler, which converts it once more to machine code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>That&#8217;s not accurate &#8230;</b> <br /> That&#8217;s not accurate.  Most compilers will convert the C/++ to ASM, and then send it to the assembler, which converts it once more to machine code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: medoelkorsan</title>
		<link>http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford/comment-page-1#comment-1362</link>
		<dc:creator>medoelkorsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford#comment-1362</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;assembly language ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; assembly language can&#039;t addressed to be higher as long as we call it low level language it is just another way to represent machine language ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>assembly language &#8230;</b> <br /> assembly language can&#8217;t addressed to be higher as long as we call it low level language it is just another way to represent machine language ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MasterMyztry</title>
		<link>http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford/comment-page-1#comment-1363</link>
		<dc:creator>MasterMyztry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford#comment-1363</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;He does seem ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; He does seem confused about assembly vs. machine code.
Assembly is the human readable representation of the machine instructions. This is important as a single assembly instruction can result in different machine opcodes. For example a relative branch instruction may be encoded as a short branch (with few bits address distance) or a long branch (up to the full address bit size).
Machine code is a fixed finite language. Assembly is a &#039;higher level&#039; compiled language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>He does seem &#8230;</b> <br /> He does seem confused about assembly vs. machine code.<br />
Assembly is the human readable representation of the machine instructions. This is important as a single assembly instruction can result in different machine opcodes. For example a relative branch instruction may be encoded as a short branch (with few bits address distance) or a long branch (up to the full address bit size).<br />
Machine code is a fixed finite language. Assembly is a &#8216;higher level&#8217; compiled language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eriksensei2</title>
		<link>http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford/comment-page-1#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>eriksensei2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Care to explain ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Care to explain what difference asm vs. machine code would make to the optimization of the code? Perhaps you should phone the gcc maintainers about their &#039;dumb&#039; compiler that allows you to do stuff like gcc -O2 -S -c foo.c.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Care to explain &#8230;</b> <br /> Care to explain what difference asm vs. machine code would make to the optimization of the code? Perhaps you should phone the gcc maintainers about their &#8216;dumb&#8217; compiler that allows you to do stuff like gcc -O2 -S -c foo.c.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mogisfubared</title>
		<link>http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford/comment-page-1#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>mogisfubared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Assembly IS machine ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Assembly IS machine code, it just replaces the opcodes with mnemonics and converts the addresses and values from binray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Assembly IS machine &#8230;</b> <br /> Assembly IS machine code, it just replaces the opcodes with mnemonics and converts the addresses and values from binray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobbygnosis</title>
		<link>http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford/comment-page-1#comment-1358</link>
		<dc:creator>bobbygnosis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluewillowdesigns.com/web-programmers/lecture-1-programming-paradigms-stanford#comment-1358</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;For clarification ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; For clarification of Assembly and Machine Codes go ahead and read &quot;Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenence.&quot; Pirsig discusses rather a lot about the relationships between programs, machines and humans. More importantly he goes into detail about the implications ragarding the confusions between Assemblies and Machine Codes. This is a subtle and very interesting problem being indirectly addressed here.

Does that make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>For clarification &#8230;</b> <br /> For clarification of Assembly and Machine Codes go ahead and read &#8220;Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenence.&#8221; Pirsig discusses rather a lot about the relationships between programs, machines and humans. More importantly he goes into detail about the implications ragarding the confusions between Assemblies and Machine Codes. This is a subtle and very interesting problem being indirectly addressed here.</p>
<p>Does that make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
